<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benefits of a Congressional resolution scolding the NY Times</title>
	<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/</link>
	<description>Politics, policy, media, culture...missives from Capitol Hill</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: balcony chair outdoor</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-2018</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-2018</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;balcony chair outdoor&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice speech. I’m curious how it went over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>balcony chair outdoor</strong></p>
<p>Nice speech. I’m curious how it went over.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Download Adore Ringtone</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-2017</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-2017</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Download Adore Ringtone&lt;/strong&gt;

Hear the ringtone of the popular song: Download Adore </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Download Adore Ringtone</strong></p>
<p>Hear the ringtone of the popular song: Download Adore
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Say What You Say Ringtone</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1974</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1974</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Say What You Say Ringtone&lt;/strong&gt;

Download the ringtone of the popular song: Say What You Say </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Say What You Say Ringtone</strong></p>
<p>Download the ringtone of the popular song: Say What You Say
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TimChapmanBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; So&#8230;about that resolution</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1884</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1884</guid>
					<description>[...] I completely agree. Why the hesitation to debate such a resolution? Does Congress not have a voice on this issue? As the elected representatives of the American people you would think Congress might want to weigh in on the NY Times decision to endanger the lives of congressional constituents and damage the ability of our government to wage the war on terrorism. This does not seem to be something that you need to wait for polling on&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I completely agree. Why the hesitation to debate such a resolution? Does Congress not have a voice on this issue? As the elected representatives of the American people you would think Congress might want to weigh in on the NY Times decision to endanger the lives of congressional constituents and damage the ability of our government to wage the war on terrorism. This does not seem to be something that you need to wait for polling on&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William Grubb</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1871</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1871</guid>
					<description>Congratulations to anyone who cancels a subscription to the NYT. Unfortunately, that is not what you will hear from talk radio, conservative papers, conservatives on cable and large parts of conservative blogs. Yes, they will say the New York Times (which is primarily responsible for breaking this story at NYT Online) is far kooky Left, irresponsibly  ideological and even treasonous. But even conservative outlets are still part of the media and they will not suggest that I cancel my subscription, that I boycott those who advertise in this liberal rag or patronize and encourage those who will not (i.e. GM). Why read or listen to someone rail on about the NYT if there is nothing they propose to do about it? This should provoke a massive fallout led by media conservatives, but people in glass houses  ... Also, a majaroty of NYT readers are liberals who do not care or are oblivious to this.

However, advertisers are apolitical and do care very much when customers are offended. A boycott of NYT ad sponsors or even a serious threat of this would get the attention of people who can end the NYT's war against the War on Terror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to anyone who cancels a subscription to the NYT. Unfortunately, that is not what you will hear from talk radio, conservative papers, conservatives on cable and large parts of conservative blogs. Yes, they will say the New York Times (which is primarily responsible for breaking this story at NYT Online) is far kooky Left, irresponsibly  ideological and even treasonous. But even conservative outlets are still part of the media and they will not suggest that I cancel my subscription, that I boycott those who advertise in this liberal rag or patronize and encourage those who will not (i.e. GM). Why read or listen to someone rail on about the NYT if there is nothing they propose to do about it? This should provoke a massive fallout led by media conservatives, but people in glass houses  &#8230; Also, a majaroty of NYT readers are liberals who do not care or are oblivious to this.</p>
<p>However, advertisers are apolitical and do care very much when customers are offended. A boycott of NYT ad sponsors or even a serious threat of this would get the attention of people who can end the NYT&#8217;s war against the War on Terror.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blind Mind&#8217;s Eye &#187; New York Times&#8217;s patriotism declared questionable, film at 11</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1869</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1869</guid>
					<description>[...] Tim Chapman Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tim Chapman Blog. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: arthur carlson</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1868</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1868</guid>
					<description>The NYT has committed treason....for the second time.  As did the Washington Post with the Dana Priest revelations.

Is there an action that a collection of citizens can take independently of the Justice Department which may or may not decide to prosecute the &quot;leakers&quot; of classified information.

The billions of tax dollars for the NSA surveillance and the associated costs with the ever developing spy systems are rendered useless by the MSM and their agents who have vowed to protect our secrets.

We are the ones that pay these enormous costs for our safety and that or our children and neighbors.  We/ve been damaged financially as well as losing the comforts and security that we've paid for.

Where is the justice.  How can we gain that justice?  That's the question that requires a grassroots effort.  Let us begin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT has committed treason&#8230;.for the second time.  As did the Washington Post with the Dana Priest revelations.</p>
<p>Is there an action that a collection of citizens can take independently of the Justice Department which may or may not decide to prosecute the &#8220;leakers&#8221; of classified information.</p>
<p>The billions of tax dollars for the NSA surveillance and the associated costs with the ever developing spy systems are rendered useless by the MSM and their agents who have vowed to protect our secrets.</p>
<p>We are the ones that pay these enormous costs for our safety and that or our children and neighbors.  We/ve been damaged financially as well as losing the comforts and security that we&#8217;ve paid for.</p>
<p>Where is the justice.  How can we gain that justice?  That&#8217;s the question that requires a grassroots effort.  Let us begin
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PartisanTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1867</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1867</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Treasonous Times Must Be Prosecuted!&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times has once again escalated its Journalistic Jihad against the American people, proving beyond all doubt that the Times' personal interests violently clash with America's public interest. On Friday, the NY Times broke the story of Ame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Treasonous Times Must Be Prosecuted!</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times has once again escalated its Journalistic Jihad against the American people, proving beyond all doubt that the Times&#8217; personal interests violently clash with America&#8217;s public interest. On Friday, the NY Times broke the story of Ame&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TallDave</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1866</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1866</guid>
					<description>Hey, the secrecy of our non-covert agents whose cover consists of nonexistent front companies and who drive to CIA's Langley headquarters in plain view every day to sit behind a desk sending their husbands out to go on public trips to Africa, write NYT op-eds and books, and make the rounds of TV shows is of UTMOST importance to national security.

This whole &quot;catching terrorists&quot; business is just a sideshow.  The two aren't remotely comparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, the secrecy of our non-covert agents whose cover consists of nonexistent front companies and who drive to CIA&#8217;s Langley headquarters in plain view every day to sit behind a desk sending their husbands out to go on public trips to Africa, write NYT op-eds and books, and make the rounds of TV shows is of UTMOST importance to national security.</p>
<p>This whole &#8220;catching terrorists&#8221; business is just a sideshow.  The two aren&#8217;t remotely comparable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Korla Pundit</title>
		<link>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1864</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://timchapmanblog.com/2006/06/26/benefits-of-a-congressional-resolution-scolding-the-ny-times/#comment-1864</guid>
					<description>I notice how the Times was all bent out of shape about the alleged outing of Valerie Plame, and blew that all out of proportion, but the outing of an entire intelligence program is of no consequence in their eyes.

Anything to hurt &quot;Bush's War&quot; I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice how the Times was all bent out of shape about the alleged outing of Valerie Plame, and blew that all out of proportion, but the outing of an entire intelligence program is of no consequence in their eyes.</p>
<p>Anything to hurt &#8220;Bush&#8217;s War&#8221; I guess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
